The light is seen as tool for projects ,events and theater. Principally the projects Luca Ruzza’s made in Nederland and Norway have had so big impact about my imagination but “sikkert” are enough to teach the diversification between the scene, the light, the new technology then are related with the use of the architecture and the architect’s ideas to make a project. The concept related to his work it’s not or wasn’t simple to see or  read. In my experience, I realized, analyzing and “reading” as the movement some components to “produce” the light are not simple to propose or promote or are realizable to find them in a system then could give the idea of space without use the normal materials components.

The light is a material then can be product, moved, and changed. As natural component is the light a immaterial game, without proportions but it’s not to simple to use if you don’t have enough ideas behind about. The Immaterial concept used to have this combination and answer  for who makes or promotes ideas is material really hard to find the real system to make what we want. Light is a not human being is an organism with a big capacity to explain in one sign all that we want  to represent.Used as concept to explain 1000 word or a scene.

Light is not only a simple system to be used in a exhibition, is not second element or decoration to our imagination, but is goal then run parallel to a focus specific to learn or make a design implicating the light as first source; light is sustainable and “friendly’ and is simple option to solutions and demonstrations with a success factors. But not simple to have access if is not used in the correct mode.The knowledge, the system, the mechanisms synthetics are enough integrated in a work to have or new system or new technologies advanced to give the possible to be expose or the opportunity to be used with a systematic control interfaced.

We can “draw” the light. But is it sure than you will have the same answer if you don’t have enough knowlogde about the correct use of the light in a network if is not only to move a lamp but is the complex ideas.

The best Light Designer give us lessons about and it is a pleasure to listen them or understand the concept.

In literature exists many books that someone can read or study but is not that.

Many can use the light but only few are really experts to manage it correctly.

When you think about LIGHT, someone must think:

1.HOW

2.WHERE

3.WHY

4.WHAT

Light is an open book, don’t need explanation or critics. The human being is enough intelligent to “read” as the human sensitive system’s is enough development.

The people think than an architect is nice only to make houses, hotels, museum, plans, or old stuff. But nobody think than the geniality is trough in architecture. The imagination of one man is not depends from the studies, but the studies sometimes in these cases are related to what we want to make, or represent,  which way take, the decisions, the knowledge but isn’t enough. How a “half”  Scandinavian can tell about is ‘Experience”. The our capacity to learn or to make us not as normal architect but a generation than can give contribution only having experience related with our studies. L. Ruzza is genius in this camp. In many example we can realize the geniality or the technologies used to produce something than it was created to realize for a space open or close, mechanism of the intellectual means and pleasure for our eyes.